CodeRabbit vs cubic
Both are AI pull-request reviewers with a verified GitHub bot. They share 1 Git platform. Facts come from each vendor's own pages; counts are public PRs created in 2026-W39 that each bot formally reviewed.
| Fact | CodeRabbit | cubic |
|---|---|---|
| Public PRs reviewed (rank) | 81,094 (#3) | 8,211 (#6) |
| Bot | coderabbitai[bot] | cubic-dev-ai[bot] |
| Category | Commercial | Commercial |
| Platforms | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps | GitHub |
| Self-host | Enterprise only | No |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing model | per-seat | per-seat |
| Entry price | $30/seat/mo (Essentials plan, monthly billing USD 30/dev; USD 24/dev billed annually. 14-day trial. Free reviews forever on public repos; docs FAQ lists Free and OSS plans. Self-hosting listed only under Enterprise.) | $40/seat/mo (Team plan billed monthly; yearly toggle shows -20%. Starter free (20 PR reviews/month) per homepage pricing section. Free for public repos. No self-host option mentioned on enterprise page or docs.) |
| Free for open source | Yes | Yes |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Sources | pricing · platforms (checked 2026-10-07) | pricing · platforms (checked 2026-10-07) |
A higher count means more observed public activity, not better reviews. See the methodology.