Greptile vs cubic
Both are AI pull-request reviewers with a verified GitHub bot. They share 1 Git platform. Facts come from each vendor's own pages; counts are public PRs created in 2026-W39 that each bot formally reviewed.
| Fact | Greptile | cubic |
|---|---|---|
| Public PRs reviewed (rank) | 30,195 (#4) | 8,211 (#6) |
| Bot | greptile-apps[bot] | cubic-dev-ai[bot] |
| Category | Commercial | Commercial |
| Platforms | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket | GitHub |
| Self-host | Enterprise only | No |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing model | per-seat | per-seat |
| Entry price | $30/seat/mo (Pro USD 30/seat/month incl. 50 credits per seat; extra credits USD 1. Starter free for 1 active developer. Free for qualified non-commercial OSI-licensed projects. Annual = custom pricing. Self-host under Enterprise.) | $40/seat/mo (Team plan billed monthly; yearly toggle shows -20%. Starter free (20 PR reviews/month) per homepage pricing section. Free for public repos. No self-host option mentioned on enterprise page or docs.) |
| Free for open source | Yes | Yes |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Sources | pricing · platforms (checked 2026-10-07) | pricing · platforms (checked 2026-10-07) |
A higher count means more observed public activity, not better reviews. See the methodology.