Sourcery vs cubic
Both are AI pull-request reviewers with a verified GitHub bot. They share 1 Git platform. Facts come from each vendor's own pages; counts are public PRs created in 2026-W39 that each bot formally reviewed.
| Fact | Sourcery | cubic |
|---|---|---|
| Public PRs reviewed (rank) | 23,611 (#5) | 8,211 (#6) |
| Bot | sourcery-ai[bot] | cubic-dev-ai[bot] |
| Category | Commercial | Commercial |
| Platforms | GitHub, GitLab | GitHub |
| Self-host | Enterprise only | No |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing model | per-seat | per-seat |
| Entry price | $15/seat/mo (Pro (private repos) USD 15/dev/month billed monthly, USD 12 billed annually; Team USD 30 / USD 24. Open Source plan free forever for public repos. Self-hosting on Enterprise.) | $40/seat/mo (Team plan billed monthly; yearly toggle shows -20%. Starter free (20 PR reviews/month) per homepage pricing section. Free for public repos. No self-host option mentioned on enterprise page or docs.) |
| Free for open source | Yes | Yes |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Sources | pricing · platforms (checked 2026-10-07) | pricing · platforms (checked 2026-10-07) |
A higher count means more observed public activity, not better reviews. See the methodology.